Shellharbour
A council that is also a property developer, on a budget that only balances on a winding-down development dividend, and the recorded votes over who gets to oversee it.
Fig. 01 / What happened
Fig. 02 / Who the record names
Fig. 03 / How we know
Each exhibit names the article that documented it. How evidence and sources are graded: evidence grade, source tiers.
What else is connected
Named in this case and in others. A count of where the record names them, not a finding about what they did.
From the desk
- Correction publishedThree hats: the Shellharbour council that is a developer, a regulator's named co-developer, and a joint-venture partner that declined to buy the estate's super lots · Shellharbour
The summary point at the head of this article said the council was a 'named co-developer on defect orders'. The source, the Illawarra Mercury of 3 July 2024, reports the Building Commissioner's stated intention: he said Frasers 'can expect some draft building work rectification orders' and that 'those orders will be issued simultaneously to Shellharbour Council because they're a co developer down…
- Correction publishedThree hats: the Shellharbour council that is a developer, a regulator's named co-developer, and a joint-venture partner that declined to buy the estate's super lots · Shellharbour
This article said the council was selling the two super lots, and that it was selling because it could not fund the build. The Illawarra Mercury does not say that. It does not name the owner or seller of the lots. It says The Waterfront, Shell Cove 'is a joint development between Shellharbour City Council and Frasers Property Australia', quotes a Frasers spokesperson on the lots, names MMJ as the…
- Record: article 1 updated, 8 October 2026Three hats: the Shellharbour council that is a developer, a regulator's named co-developer, and a joint-venture partner that declined to buy the estate's super lots · ShellharbourShellharbour · attribution of the Shell Cove lot figures
This section previously described A$19 million as the combined estimate of the two lots, a sum THE RORT had made of two figures from unnamed industry sources. The Illawarra Mercury's summary line itself speaks of "the potential for a $19 million development", and its report attributes the individual values to unnamed industry sources: the smaller, marina lot could reach $10 million and the larger…
Read the desk note
UPDATED 8 October 2026 (case: SHELLHARBOUR, article 1, Shell Cove three hats).
ARTICLE CHANGES. The attribution of the A$10 million, A$9 million and A$19 million figures for the two Shell Cove super lots was changed in the brief, the body, the fact box, the case figure and the key facts, and one dated Update paragraph was added to the third section. The Illawarra Mercury attributes the A$10 million and A$9 million values to unnamed industry sources, and its summary line itself speaks of the potential for a A$19 million development; the article had called A$19 million a sum THE RORT made. No figure changed.
STILL OPEN: nothing new.
NEXT DATE: none is fixed by any document read for this update.
- Article updated'Backroom decisions': Shellharbour widens CEO oversight · Shellharbour
Reference 2, Region Illawarra's report of the vote, previously gave no address. It now gives the article's title, date and address.