THE RORT · DOSSIER · VOLUNTARY PLANNING AGREEMENTSSTATUS · SYSTEMIC
Deemed Refusal: named together in 5 articlesDeemed RefusalThe Land and Environment Court: named together in 5 articlesThe Land and Environm…Randwick City Council: named together in 4 articlesRandwick City CouncilSydney Eastern City Planning Panel: named together in 4 articlesSydney Eastern City P…The Democratic Bypass: named together in 4 articlesThe Democratic BypassThe Housing SEPP: named together in 3 articlesThe Housing SEPPWaverley Council: named together in 3 articlesWaverley CouncilShellharbour City Council: named together in 1 articleShellharbour City Cou…Suppression Orders: named together in 1 articleSuppression Orders
DOSSIER / MECHANISMMECHANISM

Voluntary Planning Agreements

Status Systemic

The deal that lets a developer pay for extra height and density, with the public's affordable-housing return sometimes taken as cash rather than built as homes.

Last on record
2026-09
Named in
5 articles
Across
3 cases

Named in 5 articles across 3 cases 9 connections: mechanisms 4, councils and panels 4, courts 1

Tracked in the model
5 cited
Named across 5 articles and 3 cases.
5
Articles naming it
3
Cases it recurs across
9
Linked in the graph
0
Figures on file

Fig. 01 / Where this name appears

Randwick22 articles →Waverley22 articles →Shellharbour11 article →
Fig. 01Source: article scan · every article naming itAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

How we know

The sources of the 5 articles that name Voluntary Planning Agreements, by the tier the desk declared. A source supports its article, not necessarily a claim about Voluntary Planning Agreements.

Evidence strength · 31 sources across 5 articles
  • Primary 21
  • Official 2
  • Masthead 3
  • Trade 4
  • 1 not yet graded
Primary
the document itself: legislation, a court record, a filing, a regulator’s own publication
Official
the organisation’s own statement about itself
Masthead
a news organisation with a corrections policy, reporting the primary document
Trade
specialist or trade press
How sources are graded

3 of 5 articles are graded on every headline finding. How findings are graded

Fig. 02 / Named together

Voluntary Planning AgreementsDeemed Refusal: named together in 5 articlesDeemed Refusal5The Land and Environment Court: named together in 5 articlesThe Land and Environment Court5Randwick City Council: named together in 4 articlesRandwick City Council4Sydney Eastern City Planning Panel: named together in 4 articlesSydney Eastern City Planning Panel4The Democratic Bypass: named together in 4 articlesThe Democratic Bypass4The Housing SEPP: named together in 3 articlesThe Housing SEPP3Waverley Council: named together in 3 articlesWaverley Council3Shellharbour City Council: named together in 1 articleShellharbour City Council1Suppression Orders: named together in 1 articleSuppression Orders1
The 9 names most often in the same articles as Voluntary Planning Agreements. A line's weight, and the number by each name, is how many articles name both. Grey chords join the neighbours most often named together themselves (two articles or more). Circles are people and organisations, squares are mechanisms. Named together is all this shows: it is not a finding about what the relationship is.
Fig. 02Source: article scan · articles naming bothAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

How this page is assembled. The name, status and role are the desk's entity record. The article list, case counts, and connections are read by script from the published articles that name Voluntary Planning Agreements. A connection is a name that appears in the same articles; it is not a finding about the relationship. Under How we know, the sources are those articles' references, counted once each and tiered only where the desk declared a tier; a grade beside an article is its weakest headline finding, shown only where every headline finding is graded. The page is rebuilt when an article is published or changed.

← THE DOCKET