THE RORT · DOSSIER · DIGITAL IDSTATUS · EXPANDING
The eSafety Commissioner: named together in 2 articlesThe eSafety Commissio…Google: named together in 2 articlesGoogleThe ACCC: named together in 1 articleThe ACCCThe ACMA: named together in 1 articleThe ACMAThe ASD: named together in 1 articleThe ASDAustralian Clinical Labs: named together in 1 articleAustralian Clinical L…Bunnings: named together in 1 articleBunningsCyber Security NSW: named together in 1 articleCyber Security NSWJacqui Lambie: named together in 1 articleJacqui LambieKmart: named together in 1 articleKmartMedibank: named together in 1 articleMedibankNPWS: named together in 1 articleNPWSNSW Police: named together in 1 articleNSW PoliceThe OAIC: named together in 1 articleOpenAI: named together in 1 articleOptus: named together in 1 articlePM&C: named together in 1 articleServices Australia: named together in 1 articleTelstra: named together in 1 articleVictoria Police: named together in 1 article
DOSSIER / MECHANISMMECHANISM · IDENTITY

Digital ID

Australian Government Digital ID System

Status Expanding

The government identity system that starts letting private-sector providers join or apply from 30 November 2026, per the Finance Minister, or from December 2026, per the AGDIS site, arriving just as age-assurance obligations make proving who you are a condition of using the internet.

Last on record
2026-09
Named in
2 articles
Across
2 cases

Named in 2 articles across 2 cases 20 connections: companies 8, regulators and bodies 5, agencies and departments 4, police 2, people 1

Tracked in the model
2 cited
Named across 2 articles and 2 cases.
2
Articles naming it
2
Cases it recurs across
20
Linked in the graph
0
Figures on file

Fig. 01 / Where this name appears

The Reporting Rort11 article →The Surveillance Rort11 article →
Fig. 01Source: article scan · every article naming itAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

How we know

The sources of the 2 articles that name Digital ID, by the tier the desk declared. A source supports its article, not necessarily a claim about Digital ID.

Evidence strength · 83 sources across 2 articles
  • Primary 56
  • Official 4
  • Masthead 10
  • Trade 9
  • 4 not yet graded
Primary
the document itself: legislation, a court record, a filing, a regulator’s own publication
Official
the organisation’s own statement about itself
Masthead
a news organisation with a corrections policy, reporting the primary document
Trade
specialist or trade press
How sources are graded

2 of 2 articles are graded on every headline finding. How findings are graded

Fig. 02 / Named together

Digital IDGoogle: named together in 2 articlesGoogle2The eSafety Commissioner: named together in 2 articlesThe eSafety Commissioner2Australian Clinical Labs: named together in 1 articleAustralian Clinical Labs1Bunnings: named together in 1 articleBunnings1Cyber Security NSW: named together in 1 articleCyber Security NSW1Jacqui Lambie: named together in 1 articleJacqui Lambie1Kmart: named together in 1 articleKmart1Medibank: named together in 1 articleMedibank1NPWS: named together in 1 articleNPWS1NSW Police: named together in 1 articleNSW Police1OpenAI: named together in 1 articleOpenAI1Optus: named together in 1 articleOptus1
The 12 names most often in the same articles as Digital ID. A line's weight, and the number by each name, is how many articles name both. Grey chords join the neighbours most often named together themselves (two articles or more). Circles are people and organisations, squares are mechanisms. Named together is all this shows: it is not a finding about what the relationship is.
Fig. 02Source: article scan · articles naming bothAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

How this page is assembled. The name, status and role are the desk's entity record. The article list, case counts, and connections are read by script from the published articles that name Digital ID. A connection is a name that appears in the same articles; it is not a finding about the relationship. Under How we know, the sources are those articles' references, counted once each and tiered only where the desk declared a tier; a grade beside an article is its weakest headline finding, shown only where every headline finding is graded. The page is rebuilt when an article is published or changed.

← THE DOCKET