THE RORT · DOSSIER · THE PRRTSTATUS · BROKEN BY DESIGN
DOSSIER / MECHANISMMECHANISM · TAX

The PRRT

Petroleum Resource Rent Tax

Status Broken by design

The tax designed to make citizens benefit from gas super-profits. It collects almost nothing: deductions and deferrals engineered to defer liability for decades.

Last on record
2026-10-10
Named in
21 articles
Across
3 cases

Named in 21 articles across 3 cases 30 connections: companies 14, lobbies 1, mechanisms 3, regulators and bodies 3, agencies and departments 2, parties and organisations 1, people 6

Key figure on file
A$1.5 billion
PRRT forecast for 2025–26: less than beer excise, and heading downward. Treasury, Senate Estimates 2026
21
Articles naming it
3
Cases it recurs across
30
Linked in the graph
8
Figures on file

Fig. 01 / Where this name appears

Fig. 01Source: article scan · every article naming itAs of 2026‑10‑10Auto-assembled

Fig. 02 / On the record

  1. A$1.5 billionPRRT forecast for 2025–26: less than beer excise, and heading downward.Source: Treasury, Senate Estimates 2026Beer, HECS, and the broken tax →
  2. ZeroTreasury’s own Budget Papers in 2023 stated plainly: ‘To date, not a single LNG project has paid any PRRT.’Source: Treasury Budget Papers, 2023Beer, HECS, and the broken tax →
  3. -8%Marginal excess burden of the PRRT: meaning increasing the tax by one dollar generates eight cents in additional economic benefitSource: ANU Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, Chris Murphy, 2025How they killed the mining tax →
  4. Up to 58% government shareIEEFA said in 2021 that, through PRRT refunds and company income-tax deductibility, the government's share of decommissioning costs for projects that have paid substantial PRRT could reach 58 per cent. This is a possibility IEEFA raised, not a payout recorded to date.Source: IEEFA, March 2021The A$60 billion boomerang: who cleans up the offshore rigs when the gas money is gone →
  5. US$210-410m benefitWoodside's guided statutory PRRT outcome for the half year to 30 June 2026. The same table guides an underlying PRRT expense of US$190-390m; the gap is the one-off Pluto deferred tax asset adjustment of approximately US$600m pre-income tax.Source: Woodside Second Quarter Report 2026 half-year guidance [1]The boom that paid Woodside back →
  6. A$796mPRRT paid by Woodside in 2023-24, alongside A$2.26bn in corporate income tax, making it Australia's largest PRRT payer.Source: ATO Corporate Tax Transparency 2023-24, as reported by Woodside [4]The boom that paid Woodside back →
  7. Chevron A$0 PRRT on A$26.9 billion; Santos A$213 million on A$8.3 billionOn evidence before the inquiry, in 2023-24 Chevron paid A$0 in PRRT on A$26.9 billion in revenue, while Santos paid A$213 million on A$8.3 billion.Source: ATO transparency data cited in the committee report, 7 May 2026The inquiry that couldn't agree →
  8. INPEX A$0 PRRT and A$0 royalties; ConocoPhillips A$0 PRRT on A$17 billionThe report records that INPEX paid A$0 PRRT, A$0 royalties and A$484 million company tax on A$81.3 billion of income, and that ConocoPhillips paid A$0 PRRT on A$17 billion of sales.Source: Committee report, 7 May 2026 (ATO transparency data)The inquiry that couldn't agree →
Fig. 02Source: figures on file for this name, each tied to the article it came fromAs of 2026‑10‑10Auto-assembled

How we know

The sources of the 21 articles that name the PRRT, by the tier the desk declared. A source supports its article, not necessarily a claim about the PRRT.

Evidence strength · 374 sources across 21 articles
  • Primary 151
  • Official 25
  • Masthead 61
  • Trade 90
  • Aggregator 23
  • Unusable 3
  • 21 not yet graded
Primary
the document itself: legislation, a court record, a filing, a regulator’s own publication
Official
the organisation’s own statement about itself
Masthead
a news organisation with a corrections policy, reporting the primary document
Trade
specialist or trade press
Aggregator
republishes others’ work
Unusable
its own sourcing cannot be established
How sources are graded

16 of 21 articles are graded on every headline finding. How findings are graded

Fig. 03 / Named together

The PRRTWoodside: named together in 15 articlesWoodside15Santos: named together in 14 articlesSantos14Chevron: named together in 13 articlesChevron13INPEX: named together in 12 articlesINPEX12Anthony Albanese: named together in 10 articlesAnthony Albanese10Shell: named together in 10 articlesShell10Offshore Decommissioning: named together in 9 articlesOffshore Decommissioning9Jim Chalmers: named together in 7 articlesJim Chalmers7The ACCC: named together in 7 articlesThe ACCC7The ATO: named together in 6 articlesThe ATO6The RBA: named together in 6 articlesThe RBA6The Revolving Door: named together in 6 articlesThe Revolving Door6
The 12 names most often in the same articles as The PRRT. A line's weight, and the number by each name, is how many articles name both. Grey chords join the neighbours most often named together themselves (two articles or more). Circles are people and organisations, squares are mechanisms. Named together is all this shows: it is not a finding about what the relationship is.
Fig. 03Source: article scan · articles naming bothAs of 2026‑10‑10Auto-assembled

02 / Connected in the graph

03 / The evidence chain

How this page is assembled. The name, status and role are the desk's entity record. The article list, case counts, connections and the figures under On the record are read by script from the published articles that name The PRRT: the desk's key figures where it declared them, otherwise figures harvested from those articles. A connection is a name that appears in the same articles; it is not a finding about the relationship. Under How we know, the sources are those articles' references, counted once each and tiered only where the desk declared a tier; a grade beside an article is its weakest headline finding, shown only where every headline finding is graded. The page is rebuilt when an article is published or changed.

← THE DOCKET